11-30-2016, 09:48 AM | #226 | |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
One of the biggest surprises came from something I didn't think would make much difference, not nearly as much as it did. I had a 94 Firebird and my buddy had a 94 Camaro, both had the LT1 engine. We had previously taken our cars to the 1/4 mile track and ran them in complete stock form. Rather than buying a cold air intake my buddy decided we would build our own. He found the largest diameter tubing that would fit under the hood, 4" truck pipe, it did require us to shave a little plastic off the edge of the top radiator mount to fit them. The tube had a 90 degree bend halfway through it's length which worked perfectly, it cleared all the components and stopped at the bottom of the engine compartment, we then fit K&N filters to the end of the tube. We also removed or cut a circular hole in the plastic cover/splash guard so they could pull fresh air from under the car. Now it was time to test them at the track again. There could have been temperature/humidity variations from the last time we went but it had only been 2 weeks, so those will account for some but should be marginal. My Firebird gained 3/10's of a second consistently over many passes, a nice result I was extremely happy with. My buddy's Camaro "it had much lower mileage than my Firebird" gained .5 seconds on every single run he made. I know it sounds unreal, we hardly believed it ourselves, but the numbers don't lie. They were still 14 second cars, but now they were in the low 14's. Proof that a long consistent diameter intake tube with a good filter works wonders. Not too many bends though, ours had a smooth 90 degree transition. To this day if I tell people that story they don't believe it. |
|
|
11-30-2016, 10:57 AM | #227 | |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: akwesasne, NY-13655
Posts: 2,220
|
Quote:
|
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:11 PM | #228 | |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
|
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:38 PM | #229 |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 21
|
Exactly. But our self-made CAI's performed far better than any manufacturer model I'd used previously.
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:42 PM | #230 | |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Yep, you can easily tell that was kind of a last minute fix. I like to imagine hearing that design conversation as a nearby observer, lots of fast gibberish I cannot understand, yet anyone would notice the tension in their voices, then an engineer walks in with a tube of black sealant, everyone nods their heads in approval... |
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:52 PM | #231 | |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
|
|
|
11-30-2016, 12:56 PM | #232 | |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
|
11-30-2016, 01:02 PM | #233 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
|
Does anyone know what the stock stator is rated at? I'm hearing the TT250 is 300 watts, which sounds like a lot, but I thought the two bikes had very similar engines save for the counter balancer on the TT.
|
|
11-30-2016, 01:08 PM | #234 |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,107
|
If I remember right its 180 watts. I would love to upgrade my stator to a 300 watt ver if I could find the right part.
__________________
Bashan Blaze Mods: Alloy Rim's, Muffler, Mukuni VM26 Carb, Foam Filter, Tachometer, Volt Meter,LED Headlight, LED Blinkers |
|
11-30-2016, 01:22 PM | #235 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
|
Sounds like plenty for a bike this size. I know people want to power big lights and heated grips and all, but even a DRZ400 only has about 150. If it's a true 180, that seems pretty good. I'm guessing the 300 that the TT250 is claiming might be a little speculative.
|
|
11-30-2016, 01:54 PM | #236 |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,107
|
The 300 watts stator would let me run a 100 watt transceiver. (Long term plans)
__________________
Bashan Blaze Mods: Alloy Rim's, Muffler, Mukuni VM26 Carb, Foam Filter, Tachometer, Volt Meter,LED Headlight, LED Blinkers |
|
12-01-2016, 10:18 AM | #237 |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: akwesasne, NY-13655
Posts: 2,220
|
Oh no - - Joe Craig again?
By the time I finally found the book, I was tired out enough to have to go to bed. You guys can laugh, but some day you too will be pushing toward your 80th birthday, so BACK OFF. Anyway, Joe makes the observation that the exhaust and intake are inter related. So I'm going to start there with his statement. "In a racing engine, the exhaust gases must be discharged so that the piston works against the minimum possible gas pressure. The kinetic energy of the gas must be utilized in such a manner as to produce the maximum negative pressure in the cylinder towards and at the end of the exhaust stroke. Use can thus be made of a large valve overlap to get the inlet gas column moving in readiness for the next filling stroke. It has been established that the combination of exhaust pipe length and diameter is important in achieving the best possible results, and that no one combination is equally efficient over the whole speed range of the engine." Kinda sad, huh? Jeez, Joe, are you trying to tell me this is not going to be easy? That I might have to do that most dreaded of all work, THINK? I'm horrified! "Usually a long pipe of small diameter is good for power at low rpm, while a short pipe of larger diameter is better for power at high rpm. It is necessary to compromise with a pipe diameter and length that will give the best results at the most used part of the engine speed range." Think about that statement the next time you look at the inside of the head pipe. See those sloppy welds in there? Look at all that bubble gum. Any wonder that a new exhaust system really makes a difference? So now I'm going to quote the question, put forth by the tech editor of The Motor Cycle magazine, which will help yu get in the flow of what Joe says: 'Is it not true that considerable induction pipe length and long valve opening periods are necessary in order to make full use of the phenomenon you have just described?' I'm going to pull out the answer for the 348cc engine, as it is closer to what we are using here. "In the 348cc Manx engine, the diameter of the inlet port is 1 1/8th inches, and the length from the mouth of the carburettor to the middle of the intake valve is 10 and 3/8s inches." In other parts of this article he talks about a 1 degree widening of the whole inlet tract as improving power even a little bit more, but that is easy to over do. And for your information, when I first read this article, 62 (I think) years ago, I thought aha, I'll just make a trumpet 4 inches long, and I will be Golden. Didn't work. Couldn't get the carb tuned right. So I made a spacer 4 inches long and my carb problems were over.
So, hopefully you guys can see how this whole thing is inter related. Ideally, you make or buy a free flowing exhaust system that has at least some extractor effect. Then adding an inlet pipe to move the carburetor farther from the head. When you find the right length, there will be a positive pressure wave of intake gas at the valve, just when it is opening. The time for all of this to occur is very short, so even an 1/8th of an inch in the length of the pipe will make a difference. You could purposely make it too long and then shorten it in 1/16 inch steps, until you find the sweet spot. |
|
12-01-2016, 04:31 PM | #238 |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: akwesasne, NY-13655
Posts: 2,220
|
Joe had his say, now I'm going to have my say
Designing a good push rod engine, one that runs easy and tirelessly is much more difficult than designing an overhead cam engine. And Honda really did a job when they came up with this little number. Thanks to new aluminum alloys and much refined foundry technique, and modern machine tools, these are really magnificent little engines. Yes, if I was in charge of engine development over there, I'd build a thousand of these lil' darlins' stroked out to 240-250cc, and send them over here to see if American riders can tear them up. I'd send them a hundred at a time to RPS, with spare engines in the event one blew up. Before they left China I'd have tried to wear out a few on a dyno. I'd send them as soon as the first ones passed the dyno test. Then turn them loose on the American public. And see what you guys do to them. Be fun, huh?
|
|
12-01-2016, 11:38 PM | #239 |
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ChCh , NZ
Posts: 2,265
|
Only had one push rod motor MK3 Weslake..
was a great motor till the OHC motors came along Jawa/Godden/GM... then it could no longer holds it's end up... ..
__________________
09 XT660R ... 06 TTR250 ... 80 Montesa H6 125 Enduro... 77 Montesa Cota 348 MRR "Malcom Rathnell Replica"... Current resto projects.. 81 Honda CT110... 80 Kawasaki KL250A1... 11 Husaburg TE125 enduro... "sold" along with another 31... Lifan 125 Pitbike.. "stolen" ... KIWI BIKER FORUM...... http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/content.php All the best offroad rides in NZ... http://www.remotemoto.com/ E-mail... xtpete1@gmail.com |
|
12-02-2016, 07:31 PM | #240 |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 21
|
I've been reading more about intake runner length, air flow, air velocity, and how surface texture affects air flow. There are plenty of opinions out there, you've got to weed through them all.
One bit that had a contradiction to our thinking on intake runner length between the carb and valve may be plausible. This supposed highly reliable/intelligent source stated that the distance between the carb and intake valve and it's benefit from shockwave resonance had little to do with making more power until an engine reached 6500 rpm. Total length of the air intake system had more effect on an engine revving under 6500 rpm. The reason for this was air velocity, as air travels through a round tube it experiences less drag at the center of the pipe, so a longer tube will experience greater air velocity overall. The outer air near the walls acts as a bearing to reduce drag, at subsonic intake speeds you want a rough finish as this provides a more efficient laminar flow across it's surface, this would also keep fuel from attaching to surfaces along the intake since it will also ride along above this air bearing and stay suspended in the intake flow. Reducing any irregularities or mismatched surfaces after the carburetor will result in not only the best flow but a uniform air fuel charge on each cylinder fill. I'd guess this is why all my old Holley carburetors released fuel into the air stream at the center. If you decide to do any porting on the intake port do not touch the floor of the port unless it's to add texture to the surface or remove blemishes, lowering the port floor will slow down the incoming charge. Unshrouding the port ceiling around the intake valve stem will raise the efficiency of the total valve face area. If you could see from inside the cylinder looking up as the intake valve opened you'd see the intake charge coming in mostly from one side of the valve because of uneven flow above it's face in the intake port on most stock setups. This makes it harder to fill the cylinder, so power is reduced. Some people dimpled their entire intake like the surface of a golf ball. Dimples on a golf ball are there to reduce it's wake as it moves through the air so they fly straight, a large wake causes irregular turbulence causing a sphere to change direction. Jury is out on that method, unsure if you'd see any difference over roughing up the intake surface, intake air isn't exactly moving around a sphere. I suppose you could dimple your choke plate... Combustion chamber and exhaust ports do see a benefit from being polished or smooth, it reduces hot spots and resists carbon buildup, also, supersonic moving airflow is more efficient along a smooth surface. Keeping the heat in your exhaust flow results in a higher velocity which has a scavenging effect on the next exhaust cycle. Wrap those exhaust pipes and smooth out those burrs! I'm tired now. Last edited by Ghenghis; 12-02-2016 at 07:33 PM. Reason: Corrections |
|
|
|
|
|