![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The increase to a 110 main jet from 88 did the trick! |
Eh, 14.7:1 is ideal for fuel consumption and emissions, but 12.7:1 is the peak for power. I wouldn't think it would need a choke to go faster, but it's not impossible/improbable.
|
Quote:
|
You misunderstand, and you're somewhat incorrect. 14.7:1 (1 λ) is the best balance between burning everything and is okay for power on gasoline. Since everything is burning in the 'cleanest' possible way, that is the ideal balance for pure gas. Ideal stoich, 1 λ, for E85 is 9.8:1. For most fuels, the best for power is .86-.9 λ. Not sure what it would be for E5-10, but it would be a bit richer than what is best for power with gasoline at 12.6:1. Most FI systems are designed to go richer at WOT, as it provides more power, my guess in part because it keeps the charge, and thus the engine, cooler.
Engines running leaner tend to detonate more easily under load, and also produce more NxO, which the EPA strictly regulates now. There have been designs that run okay while running leaner than 1 λ for great fuel economy, like the Honda CVCC designs of the 70s-80s, the CRX being a good example of that. For more reading: https://help.summitracing.com/app/an...2Ffuel-mixture |
Quote:
|
Also, it's a bit strange to go from asking, "what does sputtering mean" to lecturing about proper afr.
|
Quote:
|
Give or take, but look at the article I posted. Engines in a higher state of tune are more sensitive (both to detonation and engine failure), but something lower performance like these bikes would probably not be in danger of detonation even if it didn't enrichen much if at all at WOT, it would just cost it some HP and acceleration. That's why rejetting them gives a significant improvement in power.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.