![]() |
#16 | |
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
The increase to a 110 main jet from 88 did the trick! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 85
|
Actually, 14.7:1 is the ideal compromise for fuel consumption and power, well above that is ideal for emissions, and well under that produces black smoke but more power. No doubt the bike out of the box was set for well above 14.7, but now is hopefully around that number.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Marseille, France -> Conakry, Guinea
Posts: 1,481
|
You misunderstand, and you're somewhat incorrect. 14.7:1 (1 λ) is the best balance between burning everything and is okay for power on gasoline. Since everything is burning in the 'cleanest' possible way, that is the ideal balance for pure gas. Ideal stoich, 1 λ, for E85 is 9.8:1. For most fuels, the best for power is .86-.9 λ. Not sure what it would be for E5-10, but it would be a bit richer than what is best for power with gasoline at 12.6:1. Most FI systems are designed to go richer at WOT, as it provides more power, my guess in part because it keeps the charge, and thus the engine, cooler.
Engines running leaner tend to detonate more easily under load, and also produce more NxO, which the EPA strictly regulates now. There have been designs that run okay while running leaner than 1 λ for great fuel economy, like the Honda CVCC designs of the 70s-80s, the CRX being a good example of that. For more reading: https://help.summitracing.com/app/an...2Ffuel-mixture |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Houma, La.
Posts: 11,851
|
Quote:
__________________
2025 Lifan KPT 400 2024 Linhai 300 ATV 4x4 2023 Lifan Lycan 250 Chopper 2023 Venom Evader 2022 Lifan KPX250 2020 Kawasaki Vulcan S (Sold) 2004 Honda ST 1300 (Sold) 2016 Black Hawk 250 (sold) 2016 Cazador180 XL 2014 Coolster150 JerryHawk250.com My YouTube Channel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 80
|
Great useful info here from JerryHawk250 and franque. Thank you both. Would you mind indulging me for learning purposes? What I have learned in the past was that stoichiometric ratio is good for idle and cruising, but rising to about 12.7 is ideal during acceleration. Would you say this is correct?
__________________
2021 Lifan Xpect EFI 2012 DF250rtc 1982 Yamaha Virago XV750 1982 Honda Twinstar CM200 |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Marseille, France -> Conakry, Guinea
Posts: 1,481
|
Give or take, but look at the article I posted. Engines in a higher state of tune are more sensitive (both to detonation and engine failure), but something lower performance like these bikes would probably not be in danger of detonation even if it didn't enrichen much if at all at WOT, it would just cost it some HP and acceleration. That's why rejetting them gives a significant improvement in power.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
__________________
2021 Lifan Xpect EFI 2012 DF250rtc 1982 Yamaha Virago XV750 1982 Honda Twinstar CM200 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|