![]() |
#16 |
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 8,140
|
Not sure who's post I read about it to be honest. I will find out for sure in either case if the K&N has any effect, good or bad, or requires any carb adjustments. I almost wonder if the airbox needs a larger opening than even a modded snorkel to really see any benefit.
__________________
Hawk Information and Resource guide: http://www.chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=20331 2018 Hawk 250 - Full Mod list here. http://www.chinariders.net/showpost....62&postcount=1 2024 Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 https://chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=34124 |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 8,140
|
Quote:
I would wager, with the stock carb tuned properly, 14 wheel hp. With mods, if your numbers are any sort of indicator, then 18whp isn't unrealistic. I am using conservative numbers obviously, but I think realistic. I should be getting my Hawk friday, hopefully. If so, I will get it setup, do the stock carb, and put a couple hundred miles on it before it's date with the dyno. Believe me, I can do a couple hundred miles in a day or two lol.
__________________
Hawk Information and Resource guide: http://www.chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=20331 2018 Hawk 250 - Full Mod list here. http://www.chinariders.net/showpost....62&postcount=1 2024 Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 https://chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=34124 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
It's a cool project, don't get me wrong, but based on the mods being discussed not sure how much improvement you'll actually be making because like was pointed out already the mods are mainly making it more tune able and are like for like. I'm thinking any increase you do see will be more a result of being able to dial the bike in tighter to it's existing capability as opposed to actual HP increasing modifications beyond the stock configuration. That said though any more HP you can squeeze from it that you don't have now is a good thing! ![]()
__________________
2005 Kazuma Cheetah 200 (Swamp Thing) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 8,140
|
Intake and exhaust upgrades will be where most of the power would be gained. The carb change is mainly for tuning ease and simplicity. That is the only like for like upgrade being made. The VM26/PZ30 is more than enough carb to support up to about 18-20hp in the limited rev range of these motors.
In my first post you will read that I did just buy a new head assembly to do a port job on, which will be installed later on with, most likely, a 32 or 34mm flat slide carburetor. The point of this is to mainly show that, if a person gets a Hawk or any GC250 powered bike, what they can realistically expect if they do all of the bolt on upgrades. I have only seen guesses on the power of these bikes, besides the factory rating, when it comes to their power. Everything from 16hp to 20+hp with the basic mods. It would be nice to have some hard figures to toss up as a reference. That is why all figures and dyno charts I want to post will be corrected. The numbers themselves aren't the goal, just the differences. Then, later on, what can be gained from a basic port job and a proper performance carb setup. Which, at this point, I would guess 20-22whp. The reason I want to do that separately from the bolt on mods, is that most people are generally happy with the bolt ons, or may not want to invest the time and money in head work etc. I will say that my goal with the head work is to not alter the powerband of the bike itself. It's not going to be overly aggressive, just a simple radius smoothing, and port matching to whatever intake I choose to run to make the larger carb manifold work correctly.
__________________
Hawk Information and Resource guide: http://www.chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=20331 2018 Hawk 250 - Full Mod list here. http://www.chinariders.net/showpost....62&postcount=1 2024 Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 https://chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=34124 Last edited by Megadan; 05-24-2017 at 04:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 312
|
Well there you go, I got the names crossed up and thought you were talking to the OP, didn't go back and look. Well that will be interesting then to see what that gives you compared to the baseline stock.
__________________
2005 Kazuma Cheetah 200 (Swamp Thing) |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 8,140
|
I often talk to myself, so it's a fair mistake lol
__________________
Hawk Information and Resource guide: http://www.chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=20331 2018 Hawk 250 - Full Mod list here. http://www.chinariders.net/showpost....62&postcount=1 2024 Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 https://chinariders.net/showthread.php?t=34124 |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 868
|
Stock filter on the left K&N on the right. I would think that if the flow less limited it would make better use of the air that it could get. I have pictures of pretty much that I did with my Hawk 1, because it's not the 2 or 3...
__________________
2015 and 3/4 RPS Hawk 250. Most people would call it a 2016 but the MCO didn't. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|